1975 Buick Skyhawk Makes A Name For Itself

1975 Buick Skyhawk Makes A Name For Itself


From April 1975 the issue of Car and Driver.

In what has to be ranked as one of the biggest recycling projects ever devised, Buick has found a set of discarded tools to get a “new” engine for 1975. It’s a familiar old V-6, originally designed to minimize the unfortunate warranty. costs accumulated with the aluminum V-8 in the 1962 Buick Special. However, as the Special developed, the small V-6 with a 90-degree swing no longer suited the vehicle’s condition, so it was discontinued. Willys-Jeep then stepped in and made the Buick Division an offer it couldn’t refuse for the old tool and put the engine in the 1968 Jeep.

In 1970, AMC took over Willys and decided to use its engine in the veteran workhorse. Again, the tools gathered dust until a stopgap marketing decision gave Buick and Oldsmobile a new small car—their version of the Monza 2+2—that didn’t have the small engine. Better yet, the V-6 unit was bought back from AMC, and Buick returned to production with a smaller engine.

Other than minor details, the V-6 is the only thing that differentiates a Buick Skyhawk or Olds Starfire from a Monza. When there is 140-cubic four inches or 262-cu. in. V-8 option in Monza, 231-cu. in. The V-6 is the only engine available in the Skyhawk or Starfire.

You pay $22 more over the Monza’s price for the optional 262 V-8; you get a V-6, the Buick name and about the same performance. Skyhawk and that Monza Car and Driver Tested turned in nearly identical quarter-mile acceleration times with interior noise levels, similar stopping distances, and fuel economy within half an mpg of each other. (Inside of C/D mileage cycle, the Skyhawk delivered 18.5 mpg compared to 18.0 at Monza.)

The same people are expected because both engines are rated at 110 net hp. The Buick’s 175 pound-feet of torque is 25 percent less than the Monza’s big-engine peak, but the discrepancy is masked by the greater weight and gearing differences between the two cars. Buick says the V-6 is only 25 pounds lighter than the Chevrolet V-8, but we found our test Monza to be a full 105 pounds heavier than a similarly equipped Skyhawk. And while Chevrolet offers a “performance” 2.92-to-one axle, there’s only one option—2.56 gear—for both Skyhawks and Starfires. In addition, Buick has specified a higher gear ratio (lower number) in the Turbo Hydramatic 350 transmission and a higher torque converter as well. So if you choose the Skyhawk over the Monza, you get less torque, less weight, longer gearing, and almost the same performance.

You get one extra with Skyhawk or Starfire: vibration. Engineers would never have built a V-6 with a 90-degree block if they had their way. Such an engine requires a 60 degree setting for equal firing intervals. (In a standard V-8, four cylinders fire each time the crank rotates once; build a V-6 with the same right-angle arrangement and fire three cylinders, then stop to wait for the missing fourth, each revolution.) significant savings to be achieved by sharing components and 90 degree V-8 blocks. In fact, the Skyhawk’s 231 engine is a Buick 350 V-8 with two cylinders missing, a slightly shorter stroke and the same pistons, connecting rods and other external components .

The main problem with the 90-degree V-6 is irregular firing intervals from cylinder to cylinder. This makes the engine feel rough, especially at idle. Vibration shakes the interior and puts the whole car in a quagmire, a serious condition that the Monza V-8 has no problem with.

When you let go, the sharpness fades and the Skyhawk’s character is dominated by its incredible height placement. The justification is, of course, fuel economy. At 55 mph, the V-6 is loafing along at an idle 2100 rpm. Lowering the transmission’s reluctance helps reduce response somewhat, but we found the car to have trouble sustaining acceleration. Through the tuning range, the V-6’s soul is restless, tempered by emissions control and the catalytic converter it’s forced to breathe. The best way to pump life into the Skyhawk is to eschew the automatic transmission and order a new optional four-speed manual gearbox.

The Skyhawk is struggling to establish its identity—with its V-6 engine, at least it’s off to a good start.

Measurements

Measurements

Year Make Model Trim
Vehicle Type: front engine, rear wheel drive, 4 passenger, 2 door hatchback

PRICE
Base/As Tested: $4186/$5142
Options: automatic transmission, $237; power steering, $111; air conditioner, $398; steering column, $45; AM radio, $63; tinted windshield, $29; adjustable seat back, $16; deluxe wheel covers, $36; protective side molding, $21

ENGINE
pushrod V-6, steel block and heads
Displacement: 231 in33788 centimeters3
Power: 110 hp @ 4000 rpm
Torque: 175 lb-ft @ 2000 rpm

INFECTION
3-speed automatic

CHASSIS
Suspension, F/R: control arms/solid axle
Brakes, F/R: 9.9/9.0 inch disc
Tires: Goodyear Steel Belted Radial BR78-13

MEASUREMENTS
Wheelbase: 97.0 inches
Height: 179.3 inches
Width: 65.4 inches
Height: 50.2 inches
Curb weight: 3105 lb

C/D EXAMINATION RESULTS
30 per hour: 4.1 sec
60 per hour: 11.3 sec
1/4-Mile: 18.6 sec @ 76 mph
90 per hour: 32.2 sec
Top Speed ​​(estimated): 106 mph
Braking, 70–0 per hour: 192 feet
On-road storage: 0.85 g

C/D FUEL ECONOMY
Estimated: 17-22 mpg

C/D EXPERIMENT EXPLAINED