Two French city cars have been redesigned. A good opportunity to deal with them in the entry-level “Evolution” and “Active” versions with the smallest engines available.
Renault Clio vs Peugeot 208 restyled: interior
For Renault, the digital instruments on the 7” screen on this Evolution trim are standard. On the other hand, its rev counter is illegible.
photo credit: Peugeot
There are no digital counters for this basic version of the Peugeot 208 in conclusion active, which still offers touch screen and Mirror Screen (wireless) as usual.
Standard equipment: common and different
Here is a list of equipment by grade common for these two entry-level fines:
- AFIL
- Air bags (6)
- Read the score
- Phares auto.
- Cruise control/speed limiter.
- Party 2/3-1/3
- Bluetooth
- Manual air conditioning
- Mirror Screen sans fil
- Front / rear window
- Multi-function leather steering wheel with height/depth adjustment (leatherette on Clio)
What is it hardware differences at this frequency level?
Peugeot 208 | Renault Clio | |
AR parking assistance | Not available | Series |
Digital instruments | Not available | Series |
Isofix place passenger AV | Not available | Series |
AutoPlus lab tests
Peugeot 208 | Renault Clio | |
Petrol engine | 3 cylinders. smooth, 12S | 3 cylinders. smooth, 12S |
High power | 75 to 5750 million/min | 65 to 6250 million/m |
A maxi couple | 118 Nm at 2750 rpm | 95 Nm at 3600 rpm |
CO2/Mal | 120 g/km/+ €100 | 120 g/km/+ €100 |
Box | Manual, 5 speed | Manual, 5 speed |
Maximum speed | 169 km/h | 152 km / h |
Acceleration 1000 m DA | 35s8 | 38s |
Repeat 80 to 120 km/h in 4th/5th gear | 13s4/20s | 14s9/26s2 |
Average usage | 5.9 l/100 km | 6 l/100 km |
Road/Highway/City | 5.4/6.2/6 l/100 km | 5.5/6.3/6.1 l/100 km |
Weight | 1062 kg | 1086 kg |
Turn the diameter | 10.8 m | 10.8 m |
Brake 130 to 0 km/h | 63 m | 65 m |
Match tips
Peugeot 208 | Renault Clio | |
Road behavior | 15 | 16 |
Safety equipment | 13 | 14 |
Authorization/performance | 14 | 10 |
Comfort/sound deadening | 17 | 16 |
Comfort/warranty equipment | 16 | 17 |
Habitability/stem | 8 | 11 |
Practical features | 11 | 12 |
Delivery/finish | 16 | 14 |
Usage | 15 | 14 |
Price | 8 | 12 |
133/200 | 136/200 |
Entry-level petrol matchup: 1.0 Sce 65 vs 1.2 PureTech 75
In these “first price” versions, our two opponents show a certain simplicity, without falling into absolute poverty. They present well and deliver standard equipment of honor and, for example, a split bench seat, a panel reading system or a touch screen and a wireless Mirror. Under their hood, we find “old” engines, without turbo, related to manual boxes 5 speed. Although not without good intentions, these blocks quickly show themselves to be out of step with the suburban environment, even ifthey can take the highway from time to time. With less muscle and a shorter fifth gear, the Peugeot 208 will be more comfortable there, without being more ambitious than the Clio (6.2 l per 100 km compared to 6.3). The repetition in the 4th is also a little shorter and PureTech 75 ch (13s4 at 80 to 120 km/h compared to 14s9). In all cases, the chassis of our two models is encouraging and the soundproofing seems to be quite accurate, as well as the means of expression. Best equipped (reversing radar, digital instruments) and sold €1,400 cheaper, However, the Renault Clio won a very close match: 136 to 133 points in favor of the Clio on our rating grid.