Stuttgart Regional Court supports consumers in Fiat Chrysler production scandal

Stuttgart Regional Court supports consumers in Fiat Chrysler production scandal

In a diesel air supply scandal involving Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA / now: Stellantis), Room 20 in Stuttgart Regional Court extended its friendly consumer attitude. In two consultations of the law firm Dr. In preliminary assessments, Stoll & Sauer questioned the court as to whether Fiat engines in mobile homes complied with legal standards for clean air supply in normal road use. In the third case, on April 14, 2022, the court ordered Fiat to pay compensation (Az. 20 O 147/21) Mobile phone manufacturers rely on Fiat Ducato for a base car, whose engine, according to the Federal Transport Authority, operates an exhaust gas purification system. Dr. Stoll & Sauer advises affected users to seek free legal advice online review. The law firm is one of the leaders in the air pollution scandal. In the process of announcing the VW model, the owners have submitted 830 million euroscomparison as well as conversations. They are currently running a model case against Daimler in a special company.

The Frankfurt Public Prosecutor’s Office has been investigating the FCA since the 2020 summer season.

Fiat customers have been in shock since the summer of 2020. The public prosecutor’s office in Frankfurt searched Fiat and Iveco offices nearly two years ago. suspicion: exhaust gas manipulation on a large scale. The results of the investigation have not yet been made public, but it is clear that the automotive company FCA has been embroiled in a full diesel delivery scandal. The car manufacturer clearly controls the purification of the exhaust gas in its engines in such a way that EU EU standards are only met on the test bench. Fiat and Iveco sell chassis and engines to tourism and RV manufacturers. The Federal Vehicle Transport Authority has now appealed to Iveco Daily. The FCA diesel exhaust scandal has entered the industry which is booming due to the corona disaster. On August 3, 2020, Dr. Stoll & Sauer have already filed the first case in Germany in a polluted air embezzlement scandal against FCA date. More than 1,000 cases filed by the law firm against FCA are currently pending in German courts. The law firm was able to win the first consumer friendly decisions. The number of expert opinions expressed by the court is also increasing. The scandal has reached the courts.

Stuttgart Regional Court considers risk of vehicle suspension

In the Fiat emissions scandal, Room 20 in Stuttgart District Court is becoming more user-friendly. On April 14, 2022, he ordered the FCA to pay compensation (Az. 20 O 147/21). In the office of Dr. The verdict obtained by Stoll & Sauer is not a basic judgment. The FCA dealt with the case and commented. The court made it clear that the user suffered damage from Fiat Chrysler. In two other cases of the law firm Dr. Stoll & Sauer, The Chamber has already cast doubt on the FCA’s arguments on March 10, 2022 (Az. 20 O 58/21 and 20 O 181/21). Here are some important tips from two oral tips:

  • In the case of Carthago Malibu Van 640 LE (Az. 20 O 181/21), the court made it clear that, unlike Fiat representatives, it held that the legal exhaust gas limit should not be taken into account. on the pilot bench, but also in the actual traffic. This is provided in the highest court case law (EuG of December 23, 2018, Az. T 339/16 and BGH of January 8, 2019, Az. VIII ZR 225/17). Therefore, based on a preliminary assessment, the court holds the FCA accountable. This results in accordance with § 823 Para. 2 BGB in conjunction with Article 4. 1 Sub-Article 2, Article 4 Article 2, Article 5 Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No. 715/2007.
  • In the second case – this refers to the Knaus BoxStar 630 ME Freeway – the FCA court wanted to know exactly if smoke emissions standards are observed in actual road use (Az. 20 O 58/21). The court summary states that the FCA representative had to consult with the FCA to answer this question.
  • Also exciting: FCA representatives have raised objections to the limitations law. The court ruled that “there is no indication that the complainant has been aware of it for three years or more or has gross negligence of not knowing the complaint which he is directing against the defendants”.
  • Judgments in those two cases have not yet been found. Dr However, Stoll & Sauer think the FCA will blame it. The situation is similar to the case that led to the FCA’s conviction on April 14, 2022 (Az. 20 O 147/21)

Dr. Stoll & Sauer is leading the campaign to announce a model against Daimler

In the office of Dr. Stoll & Sauer Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH is one of the leading legal companies in the emissions scandal. The law firm deals with banking and capital market rules, among other things, and has filed more than 10,000 lawsuits against banks and financial companies. More than 5,000 users were advised and represented on the right of withdrawal regarding loan agreements. In addition, the law firm is conducting more than 20,000 cases of exhaust gas scandals against manufacturers, traders and the Federal Republic of Germany across the country, has already won thousands of positive judgments and concluded more than 10,000 settlements on behalf of consumers.

In the popular JUVE Handbook 2017/2018, 2018/2019 and 2019/2020, the law firm is specifically recommended for the area of ​​capital investment processes (investors) in the dispute resolution unit – dispute resolution, corporate law disputes . The shareholders Dr. Ralf Stoll and Ralph Sauer also implemented a model advertising action against Volkswagen AG for the German Consumer Community (vzbv) in the legal history of the RUSS Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH. Owners of special companies are currently running a model statement against Daimler AG. In the JUVE Handbook 2019/2020, the law firm is mentioned as the market leader for its expertise in case management.

Source link