A new Mercedes Ferrari?  Silver Arrows in the strategy pool

A new Mercedes Ferrari? Silver Arrows in the strategy pool


Over the years, the Ferrari Formula 1 team had to endure ridicule and hatred because the Scuderia made mistakes in its choice of race strategy with impressive regularity. Especially in 2022, when Charles Leclerc was in the fight for the World Cup for a long time, the failure of the Reds’ tactics was a major issue. But since then Ferrari has settled somewhat.

Instead, Mercedes has made a number of strategic mistakes in recent years, which have cost them podiums and sometimes even victories. The last example of this was in Japan. A top 3 result seemed out of reach there, but at the same time Mercedes was also in a losing battle in the top 5 battle due to its decisions.

1-stop strategy is impossible: Mercedes’ strategy faux pas in a double pack

Instead of the almost inevitable 2-stop strategy, they tried Lewis Hamilton and George Russell completed the Formula 1 race at Suzuka by just one stop after early interruptions. A plan that had failed, especially since the tire wear on the W15 had reached a level that should not be ignored. In the middle of the race, the silver team realized their mistake, but by then it was already too late.

2023 also saw a series of failures within Brackley’s strategy team. The most painful of these was probably the USA GP in Austin and parallel to the bankruptcy of Japan is obvious. At that time, too, Mercedes tried to push the 1 stop strategy for too long with Hamilton, who was P2 behind Lando Norris and ahead of Verstappen.

However, the tires did not hold up. The Pirellis cost Hamilton a lot of time and forced a change of approach at the worst possible time. This gave Verstappen the bottom lane in one of the few races where victory looked realistically possible.

Lewis Hamilton ahead of Max Verstappen in the Formula 1 race in Austin
Mercedes had a chance to win in Austin 2023 by trying a 1-stop strategy, Photo: LAT Images

In the rainy drama at Zandvoort a few months earlier it wasn’t about victory, but nobody gambled as openly as Mercedes. While all the other teams went in or sat out once the rain started, the Silvers did the worst of both worlds. They waited a little longer, but only stopped before it started raining again. There was also mismanagement like in Japan, when Russell and Hamilton got into a fight before the teams strategically separated them.

Mercedes: A possible Formula 1 victory failed in 2022 too

There are also similar examples from the end of the 2022 Formula 1 season in Mexico and the USA, hard tires led Mercedes to the pits. The soft approach in Mexico City fell on the soft lines of the competition.

In the USA, after practice, they only saved the hard tire for the last race instead of the medium tire. Bad choice: Hamilton lost the lead and thus the win to Verstappen.

In 2022, Mercedes won two bets thanks to solid tires, Photo: LAT Images
In 2022, Mercedes won two bets thanks to solid tires, Photo: LAT Images

What is causing the Mercedes strategy to go wrong?

During their dominant years in Formula 1, Mercedes was something of a model for the complete execution of the racing process, including strategy. There is no uniform answer as to where the fault lies in the system for the eight-time world champion team. In the past, our own simulations have been presented as explanations several times (for example in Mexico 2022).

In addition, being a chasing team rather than a leader also has an impact on the team’s willingness to take risks. If you start the race with the same strategy as your favorite, then there is a very high probability that you will finish behind him. In a desperate search for alternative strategies, teams run the risk of automatic overload – but instead of going further, they may go further back.

Meanwhile, Red Bull and Max Verstappen can currently afford to take a conservative approach in most races due to their superior pace. There was also a constant balance of strategy in Silvers’ racing setup in the ground-effect era. They also liked to experiment with aggressive setups there – especially in Hamilton. A risk that often didn’t work out.